EMAIL TO A FRIEND COMMENT

 

CDC Report on Work-Related Asthma


As many as 2.7 million U.S. workers might have asthma caused by or exacerbated by workplace conditions, according to a report published by the CDC on December 2, 2016. 

 

Workers in various industries and occupations are at risk for work-related asthma. Data from the 2006–2007 Adult Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS), an in-depth asthma survey conducted with respondents who report an asthma diagnosis, from 33 states indicated that up to 48% of adult current asthma might be related to work and could therefore potentially be prevented. Identification of the industries and occupations with increased prevalence of asthma might inform work-related asthma intervention and prevention efforts. To assess the industry-specific and occupation-specific proportions of adults with current asthma by state, the CDC analyzed data from the 2013 BRFSS industry and occupation module, collected from 21 states for participants 18 and older who, at the time of the survey interview, were employed or had been out of work for less than 12 months. Among these respondents, 7.7% had current asthma; based on the Asthma Call-back Survey results, this finding means as many as 2.7 million U.S. workers might have asthma caused by or exacerbated by workplace conditions. State-specific variations in the prevalence of current asthma by industry and occupation were observed. By state, current asthma prevalence was highest among workers in the information industry (18.0%) in Massachusetts and in health care support occupations (21.5%) in Michigan. Analysis of BRFSS industry and occupation and optional asthma modules can be used to identify industries and occupations to assess for asthma among workers, identify workplace exposures, and guide the design and evaluation of effective work-related asthma prevention and education programs.

 

BRFSS participants who responded “yes” to both questions: “Has a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told you that you had asthma?” and “Do you still have asthma?” were considered to have current asthma. Participants who, at the time of the interview, indicated that they were employed for wages, out of work for less than one year, or self-employed were considered employed in the 12 months before the interview. Information on respondent’s’ industry of employment and occupation was coded by the CDC coders based on the 2002 North American Industry Classification System and the 2000 Standard Occupational Classification System, respectively. The current analysis used 21 industry categories and 23 occupation categories.

 

A sample of 208,788 adults in the 21 states, representing an estimated 125 million persons, participated in BRFSS and completed the industry and occupation module. Among these participants, 107,327 adults, representing an estimated 74 million persons (59.8% of the estimated survey population) were employed in the 12 months before the interview during 2013. Among adults employed at any time in the 12 months preceding the interview, 7.7% had current asthma.

 

The proportion of workers with current asthma differed significantly by age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, and state. Overall, prevalence of current asthma among workers ranged from 5.0% in Mississippi to 10.0% in Michigan, and was highest in the health care and social assistance industry (10.7%) and in health care support occupations (12.4%). Industry-specific, and occupation-specific prevalence of current asthma was highest among workers in the information industry (18.0%) in Massachusetts and in health care support occupations (21.5%) in Michigan. Among the five industries with the highest current asthma prevalence, health care and social assistance was identified in 20 of the 21 states, retail trade in 16 states, and education in 14 states. Among the five occupations with the highest current asthma prevalence, office and administrative support was identified in 16 of the 21 states, health care practitioners and technical in 15 states, and sales and related in 13 states.

 

The findings in this report provide the first state-specific estimates of current asthma by industry and occupation category for 21 states administering BRFSS and collecting industry and occupation data, and indicate state-specific variations in current asthma prevalence by industry and occupation. These variations are consistent with previous findings and likely reflect differences in the characteristics of state working populations (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, and education), socioeconomic factors (e.g., state-specific distribution of industries and occupations and unemployment rate), health insurance coverage (e.g., type of insurance and access to medical care), state laws (e.g., workers’ compensation), geographic differences in prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens, and risk for exposure to agents causing asthma in the workplace. For example, sales and related occupations were the top employers in 2015 for all 21 states assessed in this study according to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics and that might explain why this occupation appears consistently across several states.

 

Work-related asthma includes occupational asthma (i.e., new-onset asthma caused by factors related to work) and work-exacerbated asthma (i.e., preexisting or current asthma worsened by factors related to work). Persons with work-related asthma have more symptomatic days, use more health care resources, and have lower quality of life. Moreover, asthma exacerbations accelerate decline in lung function. Each of the industries and occupations identified in this report is associated with a specific set of existing and emerging workplace exposures, including irritant chemicals, dusts, secondhand smoke, allergens, emotional stress, temperature, and physical exertion, that have been associated with new-onset and work-exacerbated asthma. For example, it is well recognized that workers in the health care and social assistance industry who are exposed to cleaning and disinfection products, powdered latex gloves, and aerosolized medications have a twofold increased likelihood of new-onset asthma. A previous study reported that as much as 48% of adult asthma is caused or made worse by work; therefore, as many as 2.7 million workers might have asthma caused or exacerbated by workplace conditions in these 21 states. To assist clinicians in assessing potential workplace exposures among employed patients with new-onset or exacerbated asthma, the Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics published a list of substances that meet criteria for causing work-related asthma by sensitization or acute irritant-induced asthma.

 

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, information on asthma was self-reported and not validated by medical records or follow-up with health care providers; thus, estimates might be subject to misclassification. Second, although the BRFSS optional ACBS collects detailed information on asthma (e.g., work-related asthma), it was not possible to determine whether the current asthma was associated with work using one year of data because of the small number of respondents with both information on work-related asthma diagnosis and industry and occupation. Also, small sample sizes resulted in unreliable estimates for some industries and occupations. Combining multiple years of data from ACBS and industry and occupation module is needed to estimate the state-specific work-related asthma prevalence by industry and occupation. Third, workers with current asthma might leave employment in industries and occupations with workplace exposures that exacerbate their asthma (i.e., the healthy worker effect); thus, industry and occupation in this report might not accurately represent the industries and occupations where exposures occur. Finally, because data are limited to 21 states, the results might not be nationally representative or representative of nonparticipating states.

 

Physicians should consider collecting a detailed occupational history among adults with asthma because this is critical for making a work-related asthma diagnosis and recommending optimal treatment and management. Reduction or elimination of workplace exposures (i.e., substitution of hazardous products with nonhazardous products or improved ventilation) or removal of the worker from the environment might be necessary for management of asthma symptoms related to work. For example, reduction in exposure to latex allergens by replacing powdered latex gloves with powder-free natural rubber latex or nonlatex gloves considerably reduced work-related asthma in the health care industry.

 

The findings in this report might assist physicians and state public health officials in identifying workers in industries and occupations with a high current asthma prevalence who should be evaluated for work-related asthma in order to plan and target interventions. Potential work-related asthma exposures can be identified, and effective prevention and education strategies can be implemented. Routine collection of industry and occupation information is needed to estimate state-specific work-related asthma prevalence by respondents’ industry and occupation.

 

See the CDC Report

 

See also Medical Law Perspectives, April 2015 Report: COPD Liability Risks: When Taking a Breath Is Not Easy

 

See the Medical Law Perspectives July 17, 2015, Blog: Blaming the Victim: Challenges of COPD Treatment and Subsequent Lawsuits

 

 

REPRINTS & PERMISSIONS COMMENT